IBLI
← Journal
Case StudyFuel ShoesFootwearMar 2026 · 6 min read

Fuel Shoes: 3.1× to 4.7× ROAS with honest UGC

Stuck at 3.1× ROAS and shipping too few creatives. Fuel Shoes moved onto a 20-videos-a-month plan — ten angles, two cuts each — and let raw, honest reviews do what polished product films couldn’t.

  • ROAS

    3.1× → 4.7×

  • CTR

    3.9%

  • Creatives

    160+

  • CAC

    ↓ 31%

Fuel Shoes: 3.1× to 4.7× ROAS with honest UGCFUEL SHOES

Fuel Shoes wasn’t a premium brand, but the ads were trying to look like one. The account was sitting at 3.1× ROAS, the creative library was thin, and Meta didn’t have enough to learn from. The fix wasn’t better production — it was more of it, and rougher.

The brief

Fuel Shoes was running studio-shot product films and styled flat-lays — beautiful, indistinguishable from every other sneaker brand on the feed. The CTR was fine; the CVR wasn’t. People were clicking for the look and bouncing on the price-to-quality verification step — the one thing brand-shot ads can’t do.

The bigger issue was volume. The account simply wasn’t shipping enough creatives for Meta to learn anything useful. Account stuck at 3.1× ROAS, CAC creeping up, hold rate flat.

The plan: 20 videos a month, 10 angles

We onboarded Fuel Shoes onto a 20-performance-videos-per-month retainer — not 20 cuts of the same idea, but 10 distinct creative angles with two cuts each. Each angle was tested across multiple hooks, scenes, and actors, then fed into Meta on a rotating schedule so the algorithm always had fresh signal to work with.

Within the first month, Meta started picking favorites we didn’t expect. Honest, raw, unscripted reviews quietly outperformed every polished cut. The trust the brand had been trying to manufacture through production value was already there — it was just sitting in a creator’s living-room footage instead of a studio.

The four formats we landed on

  • Unboxing + first impressions. Creator opens the box on camera. No script. The face when the sole flexes is the ad.
  • Honest review at day 7. A creator who’s actually worn the shoe for a week, talking about what surprised them and what didn’t. Always one negative beat — never sugar-coated.
  • The flex test. Sole bend, stair walk, jump test — all in the first 4 seconds. Visual proof of build quality.
  • Side-by-side fit demo. Same foot, different sock, different sizes. Solves the single biggest sneaker conversion blocker — “will this fit?”
VIDEO
FUELSHOES2
VIDEO
↳ replace later
‘Day 7 honest review’ format — Fuel Shoes’ highest-converting creative type in Q1 2026.

Why honest reviews work for value brands

Premium brands sell desire — their job is to make the customer want the thing. Value brands sell certainty — their job is to make the customer sure the thing is worth the price. Sugar-coated UGC kills certainty; raw, honest UGC builds it. Once Fuel Shoes stopped trying to look like an ad, the audience started watching like it wasn’t one.

We stopped trying to make every ad look like an ad. Once that fight ended, the numbers picked up inside the first month.

Fuel Shoes brand lead

The numbers

ROAS
3.1× → 4.7×
CTR
3.9%
Creatives
160+
CAC
↓ 31%

The takeaway for value-tier brands

Stop trying to look like a premium brand. Premium brands work harder than they look — value brands work cheaper than they look, and the audience needs help believing it. The cheapest, fastest, most durable trust signal you have access to is a creator on camera who already paid for the thing — shipped at enough volume for the algorithm to actually learn from.

⏤ Working on something similar?

Let’s talk about your creative system.

Start a conversation →